PJ the Wrong Way Part II: A shoe in the cavern
A series on personal jurisdiction and a pending Supreme Court case that could give corporations with nearly limitless power to determine how they can be sued.
A series on personal jurisdiction and a pending Supreme Court case that could give corporations with nearly limitless power to determine how they can be sued.
On July 19, one man was killed in a Michigan car accident involving a semi-truck and a law enforcement vehicle. According to a local news report covering the tragic accident, the fatal crash occurred in Dewitt, at the intersection of Old US-27 and Cutler Road. The crash occurred around 8:30 in the evening.
While the duty of responding police officers is primarily to make sure that anyone who was injured in an accident receives the medical attention they need in a timely manner, law enforcement is also responsible for investigating the crash.
Earlier this month, three children were killed when another motorist rear-ended the carriage that was carrying the children and several other family members.
In a recent case, an appeals court considered a Michigan personal injury claim involving an employer’s refusal to pay personal insurance protection (PIP) benefits. The issue before the appeals court was whether the claim was timely filed after the employer stopped paying the claimant’s PIP benefits.
Earlier this month, a state appellate court issued a written opinion in a Michigan car accident case discussing the state’s personal protection insurance (benefits) system. The case is important for all Michigan accident victims because it shows how the PIP system works, and under what circumstances an injury victim may not be covered.
Under Michigan law, bicyclists have an absolute right to ride on public roads and are entitled to all the same rights as those operating motorized vehicles. At the same time, bicyclists must obey the rules of the road, including both generally applicable laws as well as bicycle-specific laws.
For years, the top causes of Michigan car accidents have been speeding, distracted driving, and drunk driving. According to the most recent data from the Michigan State Police, of the 937 auto accident fatalities that occurred in Georgia in 2017, alcohol was involved in 320 accidents. Almost a third of those fatal Michigan DUI accidents occurred in Wayne County, Oakland County, or Kent County.
In a recent personal injury case before a Michigan appeals court, the plaintiff sued a school district after the plaintiff’s car crashed with a school bus. The plaintiff filed a claim of negligence against the bus driver and argued that the school district was vicariously liable. The school district argued that the plaintiff’s claims were barred due to government immunity.
Despite decades of government programs discourage drinking and driving, drunk driving represents one of the major causes of all Michigan car accidents. Indeed, it is estimated that approximately 27% of all serious Michigan car accidents are caused by drunk or drugged driving. Michigan lawmakers take drunk driving seriously, and have enacted a strict set of […]
Traverse City
300 E Front St #445
Traverse City, MI 49684
Phone: (231) 221-0050
Fax: (231) 221-0051
Grand Rapids
250 Monroe Ave NW, #400
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
Phone: (616) 717-5666
Fax: (231) 221-0051
Detroit
400 Renaissance Center #2600
Detroit, MI 48243
Phone: (248) 216-1660
Fax: (231) 221-0051
Los Angeles
633 W 5th St 28th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Phone: (213) 277-0001
Fax: (231) 221-0051
Boston
361 Newbury Street
3rd – 5th Floor
Boston, MA 02115
Phone: (617) 918-7790
Fax: (231) 221-0051
New York
One Rockefeller Plaza 10th Floor
New York, NY 10020
Phone: (212) 882-1900
Fax: (231) 221-0051
Toll Free: 800-525-NEUMANN (800-525-6386) Fax: (231) 221-0051
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.